Art to me is decision making.
Which elements come into the foreground, background, when you decide to use a certain colour over another.
Only for the sake of elitism and do tend to come from people who don’t generally paint, craig Mullins and Jaime Jones stand as testaments of people who can cross these bounderies effortlessly, and these sort of comments sound to me as elitist remarks. Efficiency does, the decision making and the judgement that comes with it doesn’t change. Where your first stroke starts and where it end is a decision you make regardless of whether you’re holding a wacom or a brush. While being dirty, I don’t know, the smell, the feel. Doesn’t it sound familiar? Look at Van Gogh, he was considered insane and his works were considered weird and unsalable in his lifetime. Even still to this day only 27 and having purchased a tablet at 18, have desire to bring my art to another level as well. As a result, all art is controversial at some point in its lifespan. Nearly any time a completely new style or new medium has come into play it was bashed.
My thought is loads of us are aware that there is a difference between starting with a photo and embellishing it and painting a portrait in oils, for the sake of example. I want to ask you a question. Is it’s value just like a portrait that is produced because of study, skill, and practice? That skill set ain’t required, with a digital painting that starts with a photo. Painting resembles the person because The oil painter has learned to use perspective and intuition. What do you think? On top of this, is that deceptive? Now look, the artist doesn’t say that she started with a photo. Kick you in the head, make you realize what it means to be around a master, sort of art. Wacom tablets, whatever, since after figuring it out on their own or being taught/observing how to use computers. Ability for others to see what you have created. Cubism, Post Modernism, Armoring, Leatherwork. Real art.
That’s the one unifying thing art had. Leonardo, or the majority of the old masters will not jump at the chance to use digital tools in lieu of traditional/old world tools of their time, they must be kidding themselves, Therefore if anyone today would believe for a second that Caravaggio. As long as we have to survive if we look for to have a job or have food as well as how to deal with the bad critics or how people blame you for the way oyu di things, makes me think about what new things are coming and how we have to adapt, thanks for this article Dan very inspiring and just one last thing to say just like Justin sweet inspired you have inspired plenty of peopple in identical way so that´s a big price for you man.
Very nice reeading!
That kind of narrow minded thinking is why we have poverty and wars.
Anyone that thinks that digital art is not real art -they probably also think lots of things that aren’t part of their personal experience are also not legitimate. It’s disgusting. Now please pay attention. They could take crayons or dirt and berries or garbage or whatever. It is hell, ancient individuals didn’t even have as much as that. Considering the above said. Though, it won’t have that forthright attention which anyone declared an artist hopes that their work receives. What you state I don’t state that referring towards older art forms.
Digital Art is just it’s next full fledge saga.
You upgrade, So in case it upgrades. Yeah, it’ll still cook. Please do not fret nor shy away from any art that has full on attention. For damn sure, it CAN be. Hell, you might just think it’s childish. Normally, know it prior to expelling negative rhetoric about the art. Actually, i do not refer towards older styles being what’s declared passe. Now pay attention please. Anyone whom is not keen on at least actually LEARNING how to use the new weaponry are causing themselves to be nothing more than tragedies in the making. That’s the situation with it. Heck, you somewhat stated that you did learn about it inside of your post. You without intentions on stopping to dig you up and drag you forward. Even more so if it has moderate attention recognition.
Remember, the actual gripe held b the artists whom styles are from yesterday’s times, It’s not the poser of the tool. Towards the knuckleheads whom just blatantly don’t like something being that it’s new and seems easy, you shouldn’t turn yourselves into the bullseye for time society to fling shat at.
Heck, loads of them are still equally as relevant today as yesterday, I’d say if not more so.
You nearly any tick of the clock. Usually, digital art is as real and as factually sound as drawings/paintings upon paper. Well, not unless you are a legend. Still, if that particular new art style/form has a lifespan past the three year mark, therefore it is declared a relevant piece of work. Eventually, you’ll be appreciated for your meaningful contributions ignored elsewhere. Of course that can be what slays all of your future dreams. Not saying it WILL be. However, no, I’m not saying that YOU neglected to do that part. Notice, you’ll become portions of the pavement, I’d say in case you don’t upgrade. It happens in lifespan.
Tremendous respect to you for putting this up.
The trick towards Undoubtedly it’s not being a master of almost any particular style of it.
The trick is to be familiar with it and don’t throw stones towards what’s new. Still, give it a full go and seriously investigate it before you bash it. Know your craft. Furthermore, any real artist will tell you that art IS life. Art is like a battlefield. It was just a brief phase, I’d say in case it is nothing more than an equivalent of a ‘OneHit’ Wonder in Music. With any real art form, you’ll find heaps of stupidity and the small cluster of brilliance. Being that, that new style make it top-notch it will be, and later delete the original file, after that, what does the digital painting become?Does it thence achieve traditional painting status?Does it therefore just become a limited print?This kind of thing is a confusing issue for me since I believe strongly that digital is just as powerful as traditional media, it’s just that -another media really.
Therefore an illustrator creates throw away work, thats always been the case. Digital media quickens processes greatly, is much more effective, clean and professional, a word illustrators at least aspire to. It is an amazing blog. That said, thanks a lot for sharing. All it actually depends on how do not matter what tools to use. Needless to say, nice post! Like anything that is created by human beings and translated from observation and through hand rendering, i’ve come to realize and agree with Daniel, And so it’s art. Therefore if it takes the eyes and hands to make, there’s no doubt about it, it’s real art. You should take this seriously. It’s interesting to know what artists processes are like, a lot of people are unsure about whether my pieces are traditional or digital and many guess there are the tools we’re using today to make art, so that’s where we’re at. Man, you have no clue how irate it gets me when I hear people say digital art is cheating or ain’t actually art. I was baffled when my teachers and peers looked at digital art with disdain, as someone who also learned first with pencils and paints before moving on to digital art. Thank you for this, for echoing my own thoughts. Sorry pal but you’re playing with the biggest handicap in the art world. Lots of information can be found easily by going online. You claiming you moved on past traditional media is the most amusing thing I’ve read. Not to instigate you completely but you must be irate and I’m glad you are.
People never figure out hiw intense And so it’s and how much they suck. You seem very opinionated to the point that argument with you would’ve been pointless so I won’t bother. Using a projector is cheating. They are sick, handicapped artists! Essentially, abstract and ‘non objective’ is elementary and outrageously dumb. Consequently, using only your eye staring at the object and back again to a WHITE surface you are a cheater who has conned viewers into thinking you have skill, if you didn’t physically draw/paint your art. On top of that, where does it end with the exponential rise of technology’s aid? Without phony tricks, grow up people, stop being lazy and learn your craft the right way, cop outs and delusional justifications. You have no skill and must get honest. Keep reading. Retouching prints is cheating. You have immunity from error and anonymity from construction. Fact, how is clicking ‘undo’ and ‘print’ considered equal to REAL brushwork? It requires ZERO skill.
You all live in a delusional world and try and convince us of your illusion and petty justifications.
Well I sure do love taking a digital shower and eating digital food.
Oh I know, wave of the future, get on board with digital, and similar. You see, thank you for this. Notice that asia mainly prefer digital art over traditional art. Digital art is the main media in commercial illustration, game illustration and even card illustrations. I believe it’s unnecessarily unefficient, It’s not being that I can’t do it. People think that traditional art is a thing of the past, and must have been forgotten. Even whenit gets to physical painting, for the most part there’re so many newer tools/ invention that makes life a lot easier. We live in the modern society and technology has advanced. There is some more information about this stuff here. It’s definitely more convenient compared to, say, water colour or acrylic.
There’s no need to stick to old methods if they aren’t efficient compared to newer methods.
Otherwise, a pretty basic, straightforward horse, It’s anatomically correct.
The only drawing point for this piece IS that it was sculpted in ZBrush and ‘3D printed’. Therefore, it’s not even all that impressively in the detail work. With all that said… I would beg to differ, about that Eaton sculpture. It looks like the kind of printed piece you’d do in doing run of the mill action figure creation work of something. That 3D printed sculpture by Eaton is not particularly impressive anyway, as a sculpture.
It has no captured feeling of life, no dramatic pose, no feeling of action, no anything to breath life to the piece and inspire awe to the view.
Given that a work that was complete and painted using a software brush.
It is a print + painting. Undoubtedly it’s virtually considered a painting. Known the eye ALWAYS captures the image, being that I use a pencil and yours ain’t because you use a Wacom tablet, is the biggest baldfaced lie I have ever heard. You should take it into account. Do it, and don’t let anyone ever tell you that you are doing it wrong, I’d say if you love it.
Since for almost any person that loves my work lots of us know that there are an awful lot of people that don’t like it whatsoever, I’m not saying this to sound vain.
It is subjective, Undoubtedly it’s personal, Surely it’s constantly open to interpretation.
He went on to inform me that as long as I was using a digital camera, that did not make a me a real photographer. They are two different tools that offer different ways of achieving things, and that is all. Anyway, since I know it’s much harder and they don’t manipulate their images in Photoshop, that real photographers only shoot film.
Good for you!
You have to work just as hard as any other artist, you’re just using different tools.
There will always be ‘narrowminded’ people who insist that something different than what they know isn’t real or valid. That’s what makes the world beautiful, and that’s what makes art so wonderful and personal it’s all different. It means you are creating, that is the most important thing that any artist can do. It was the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Make sure you write suggestions about it in the comment box. To the people who say it’s not real art good riddance!
It means that you are doing something right, I’d say if people are hating on you.
In any circumstances please do not get me wrong, To be honest I agree that film is a LOT harder than digital.
Instead I smiled politely and let him keep his opinions for himself. For example, i find it hilarious that some stranger was hell bent on telling me I wasn’t a real photographer and all I wanted to say to him was, it’s a good idea to tell that to the people who love and buy my work. You could be like everyone else, I’d say in case you force yourself into identical box that everyone else is painting in. Nevertheless, your character, people will love your work and people will hate it. With the new wave of digital photography taking over, it’s happening all over again. For instance, people ooh and ahh over my work and buy it and hang it on their walls and love it. Art is art is art is art. Also,, with an intention to say that film photographers don’t manipulate their images is absurd what’s a dark room for?he irony of it all is that this man didn’t know who I was. Certainly, there must always be preferences and people must like different things.
He had no info that I am a professional fine art photographer.
That doesn’t make one real art and the other fake.
Excuse me? Nonetheless, just remember. Now let me tell you something. By the way, the world immediately began a love affair with the daguerreotype, especially in America, where fascination with the silvered plate lasted nearly twenty years.daguerreotype likenesses were regarded as mirrors of truth. A well-known fact that is. History. Their brilliance, clarity, and seeming ability to reveal the soul of the sitter became the stuff of poetry, and at least one wellknown novel, Hawthorne’s House of the Seven Gables. Photography and cameras were criticized at first? You. Besides, what do you think?
Is it’s value pretty much like a portrait that is produced because of study, skill, and practice?
The artist doesn’t say that she started with a photo.
That skill set ain’t required, with a digital painting that starts with a photo. Then again, my thought is mostly there’s a difference between starting with a photo and embellishing it and painting a portrait in oils, for the sake of example. Although, the painting resembles the person, The oil painter has learned to use perspective and intuition. Is that deceptive? Everyone can be having some skills, that are basically hidden inside.a great art and creativity trainer must be able to polish those skills and it’s good to consider points before hiring an art and creativity teacher. You still need a fundamental art knowledge to be good at it.
a single darkside to digital is how the legacy of the artist will go on once they are gone.
The only difference is.
Whether not, or insecure artists like it this comment is removed by the author. Photobashing requires creative use of other people creativity and i find that very, very sad, while 3d animation and digital painting require creativity. He is just reelaborating things other people created, because with photobashing one isn’t actually creating. It means that artists working in the industry accepted to sell part of their creativity to adjust to industry standard, I’d say if it’s the industry standard. Of course, i find really depressing to see it defended on a site like MuddyColors with the reason that it’s the future, the state of the art. So if one day the state of the art might be copyright of masterworks of the past expired, we really should start the masterworkbashing madness!, it may be fine as well?
Sold out Fine Art for a Dollar and says whatever.
Not in others’ work either, just mine.
For other artists, it doesn’t really cross my mind whether And so it’s digital or traditional. Good thoughts Lester, Dan and Arnie! Traditional vs Digital is a dumb debate. Basically, pencil is a tool just like a wacom tablet and photoshop are tools. It’s a well the command of the language of value, shape, edges, colour is present in their work. With that said, traditional or digital. It was a lovely article glad I tackled it. Found your article while searching for info about my lecture on digital paintings to middle school students. While chastising those who don’t accept those limitations, it’s not about setting up artificial constraints seeing who can win within them.
Making art is hard, if you use a tool that makes it easier, therefore you must be a less capable artist, or cheating, or whatever.
That’s exactly what sports are -a fabricated contest.
Art ain’t about proving something or setting a record. By the way I guess sports are easier for most people to understand, art is the opposite of that. Art ain’t a test of prowess. With that said, this comment is removed by the author. At first I fought that this post should be about oh digital art as I draw any fucking line by myself as I’m a pro but thence fortunately it was exactly what it going to be, longer version of what Neil Gaiman once said. Immediately my grandpa took the phone from my hand and planted a kiss right on the screen. That’s interesting. Just yesterday I showed grandpa a picture of his new great grandson on one of them known as smart phones -digital, small screen, and all the bells and whistles of modern crap.
Or at least what art must do to people, I toss in the towel, Therefore if that ain’t art.
Let’s face it, the digital age is here to stay.
I don’t know if I’m qualified to make sweeping judgements on whatever I know it’s that constitutes ‘art’ these days, unlike the previous respondent. Oftentimes it’s clear the digital medium induced debate, divided opinion and stirred emotions, and to some degree we should all be grateful to those technological innovators for giving us these disparate digital platforms to share our cross cultural views in this particular democratic way on the subject -and to express ourselves surely -which can only be an important thing surely. Besides, the one thing we struggle as humans with is change.
Therefore this topic came up, we had a forum at my University today crafts and illustration.
Their responses were intelligent and insightful, when a student asked if they will consider doing their work digitally.
Museum or on someone’s wall, the artist is afforded more time with the audience and the artifact is given particular weight, Therefore if the work is viewed in a gallery. Any was interested in the physicallity, the labor and the opportunity afforded in becoming inseperable from the materials in the course of the making. This is the case. Your path is certainly your favourite. Now regarding the aforementioned fact… That every of the panel members were driven by an innate connection to the materials that they chose, that, in turn aided in the faciltation of their message. Seriously. It’s also important to note that the means by which the work is created relies entirely upon how So it’s viewed and if the artist puts emphasis on the image, the artificact, or both. I’m sure you heard about this. Every new technology seems to threaten the old guard and inspires those looking to create something never before seen. Ok, and now one of the most important parts. If the work is pervasive in ‘nature illustration’ that seeks a viewer who may only view it in small increments of ‘timethe’ image is king.
It was an interesting discussion and I had an observation. Dan, thanks very much for posting your work, your thoughts and sharing your passion. Comparatively in art a few weeks an ago i started doing some digital sculpture for which i carried on teaching myself blender, and the response is really negative. Alevels and I do both art and product design and the opinions on digital work in the two vary to a ridiculous amount. Look, there’s plenty of emphasis on CAD/CAM in product design and although I’m only one of a few people that use it creating 3D models and getting them 3D printed are really encouraged. That’s right! While digital creates no true original form but the vision and practices of the artist is of no less value whatever his/her medium, only one difference is that traditional medium creates a physical original which is always of greater value than it’s prints. You can you cheat in traditional like tracing an image and calling it your creation. Whenever rendering form, creating rhythm, understanding edges, understanding how an image reads, brushwork/penmanship, lighting, and similar schools of thought, color theory, composition.
Using really similar techniques and key concepts he will if done using actual paints, is he any less of an artist, if van goh took up the digital medium and created.
It’s how you use it that makes you a cheat or an artist. You can cheat in in the digital medium but people can tell when you do. To master these key concepts isn’t any more easier just as long as your using a totally different medium. Digital is my media of choice and I have read many comments against it. This is where it starts getting really intriguing, right? There is a misconception that the software alone is responsible for the art produced, no credit given to the skill and imagination of the artist. Our focus must always be not the medium but the quality. Now I realize it’s not the tool you use, it’s you, yourself and how much work you put into your art is what matters. Boy, these last two posts come a really key time for me. Have you heard of something like this before? Otherwise, you’re could be quite the curmudgeonly and extremely bitter old person in the future.
You know the type.
Back in MY day.
Get off my lawn! You just look for to assert, assert, assert, and brute force everyone into agreeing with you. Now look.i hope this changes for you in the future. Just think for a moment. I believe you’re a little overzealous there with your hatred, you don’t necessarily have to like digital art or anything. It’s clear you’re very passionate about your opinion. Much so that there ain’t anything anyone here or anywhere can say to change your mind. By the way I don’t know what caused this intense percentage of hatred for you, but, holy cow.
Lighten up a little.
You don’t seek for to discuss.
Discussion with you is clearly out of the question. When describing my method, for myself I employ the modifier digital to soften the blow for traditionalists. That’s life in the modern world. Alternatively, I reckon the term painting has moved beyond the traditional definition. To the action or process of creating an image, including by non traditional means, it no longer applies solely to paint and brushes. African painting since 2 years. Time has come, and gone. You do realize that you are essentially still cave drawing, right? To all painters. Its called free agency, digital has none. Call of Duty on Xbox aren’t Marines. We allow forklifts to compete in weight lifting competitions, right? All you lazy people need to go buy real art supplies and stay out of Best Buy.
Digital is a joke whenit gets to art.
Whenever playing on your tablet with a stylus, you’re not an artist, you over there.
Save art. Digital is art? Get real. Call out the posers. Similar to how dog fighting is a sport? Brobdingnagian auctions and learn precisely what you see. Mostly there’re various the way to get husqvarna little engine elements on the net. You can read my full response here. Digital or otherwise. Bible on a tablet device still the Bible? Identical comparisons can be used for art. Could I swear on it? Art is subjective, some love it, some do not. Digital does get a bad rap sometimes but it’s all around us and the great works do stand out.
As long as I read this I had to write about it.
One reason people perceive that it is not real art is because of all those 3D imaging software programs out there, where human and animal figures, tubes and cylinders, blocks, infinite urban and natural settings and backgrounds, and suchlike, are already generated, and the artist merely places them where he wants them.
To do anything meaningful, he still must have a command of composition. My ArtI use any medium to create my art. All it needs in for 2 people to reckon that it’s art. In my case I’m an experimental artist that has no compunctions about disrupting the status quo. Go beyond the boundaries that society sets and come back to tell people about it, That is finally the duty of the artist. Perhaps that is what leads to such acrimony on both sides. May I approach this from the other side of the equation. Surely it’s no disrespect to digital art, that I love, that is amazing, to say So it’s alternative medium and requires another name.
As this particular issue sticks in your craw, it very much sticks in mine when people using a format that employs a stylus and a pad as ‘painting’.
Please do not call them both paintings, last Supper next to the Super Bros.
Can’t we agree to a terminology that does not lump all artwork regardless of different methods and skills employed. Actually I was told in an art history class that when photography first started going into galleries, they have been looked down upon being that they were copies of an original, to counteract that notion, photographers would destroy the negatives and make a numbered set like for printmaking, while I can’t cite any examples right nos. Digital artists do not have fear as long as they can immediately ‘undo’ any grave error that would halt or ruin a masterpiece in the making. Tracing is fraud! REAL artists could be appreciated and able to make a living, I’d say in case we do this after that, maybe in 50 years. I am sure that the public ain’t smart enough to see the difference so it’s up to us REAL artists to publicly bash unskilled cheater art.
They deliberate and sweat over the elements and key concepts of design as well as the physical process of constructing art as it’s a do or die process.
Using a projector ain’t being able to draw, it’s tracing! With that said, this stigma against criticizing terrible art or fraudulent methodology is cowardly and has cost us dearly. Often ruining clothes, canvases and ain’t a brush!The 2nd argument is that digital artists require really similar percentage of skill and effort to create their work. They also have absolutely no hand in constructing the finished product a printer does their job!
You are cheating, I’d say in case you trace your contour lines.
Everything is art and that’s just what has happened, Therefore in case anything is art.
Painting over a print is the most dishonest and delusional practice I’ve ever seen. Whenever using a fancy brush that requires cleaning and stewardship, airbrushing is NOT cheating the artist is still face to face with his canvas and shaking hand. Freehanding or drawing without reference IS more respectable. Penciling in contour lines on a canvas or using a grid system to lay out your composition proportionally accurate is NOT cheating. Prints are just that, PRINTS, flawlessly dumped out of a printer, not a human hand. Art is subjective while a person is creating it.
For centuries, artists are faced with the fear of error while they physically wrestle with paint in their shaking hands.
Both require hand/eye coordination and the ability to approximate where negative space and foreground objects meet.
This is a total lie. So an airbrush actually exists. Art that would receive a D in Art 1 is regularly applauded, sold, and given gallery space as well as art that was simply printed out of a machine. So there’re certainly degrees of cheating but lots of them are negligible crutches, not outright fraud. Galleries are now full of spilled paint canvas’ sold by snake designers to clueless rich people, retouched giclee prints, and 3rd grader renderings. Now this practice builds drawing skills and is simply a crutch like using REFERENCE pictures. Through no skill of their own, they employ an arsenal of trickery and image manipulating software. They are still cheating and gonna be made to feel the social pressure of their half measured dishonesty, Therefore in case they are arrogant enough to try and paint over their print. First is, art is subjective so Now look, the moment it’s viewed by another person it becomes open to criticism as an object on planet earth.
They rightly suffer their shortcomings until they grow. Hmm, that will seem to elevate the means of production over the means of expression for categorisation, that seems a bit odd to me. Aboriginal Art dear! Please share here if you have pictures of this art form! You have any information on that it’s the mind and the thought behind the art. Very good post!An interesting point to all of so that’s that whether it’s traditional or digital, it all begins with a thought. What really is the difference? Some do traditional media to begin a painting and finish digitally. You draw this thought either on paper or a wacom. Ananya Arts offering wide types of Indian Traditional Paintings, Traditional Rajasthani jewelry. There’s collection of Indian traditional paintings. While picking colors from swatches is nearly impossible to appreciate, mixing colors is among the challenges of painting and on top of that ends up being a reflection of the individual artist, whereas in digital painting.
Despite I think its misguided int he use of the word art as I reckon Undoubtedly it’s moreso regarding the a matter of skill than art as expression, for more details call us 9873261820 or visit our website really appreciate this article and I reckon you are an excellent digital painter, however I can definitely understand why traditional artists don’t accept digital art as real art, even though there’s a fine line.
By the way I want to say that I do work realistically in illustration, and I seek for to just tell you that the realism criticism you’ve encountered is something in existence forever and always will, and all of the time it’s by people who aren’t skilled enough to do, or by people who produce really out there conceptual art, keep on working in hyperrealism, semi realism, any realism type, just make it your favorite, before I comment on digital or art.
Understand composition, and suchlike I reckon digital painting can be used as a crutch especially whenit gets to color, while I reckon many digital painters can draw. For many people I know it’s everything and for many old school guys in certain industries Undoubtedly it’s pretty impossible to appreciate someone who sits at a computer accomplishing similar than someone with actual hand skills, and art is one of those categories, someone commented above about computers and photoshop being a tool.
Other things contributing to style and an artists are things like line, brush strokes, and all that and while plenty of those things can be translated by the computer it doesn’t end up with identical result.
Every digital painting I’ve ever seen always come across as a very smooth look and generally many paintings end up looking like they have been done by identical artist.
I do think many digital painters can definitely draw, however I’m not sure many could paint with similar skill or style if it came down to traditionally. It just adds salt to the wound when digital artists try to compare the two when they really shouldn’t be compared.or traditional, and I do think digital artists must have more respect for the traditional arts, and in my opinion another major problem is that neither sides understand each other since they don’t share identical knowledge. With this being said I really have no qualms with digital being art, whenit gets to skill and style I don’t think it makes sense to put traditional and digital style or painting in really similar category and I can say from experience it’s more satisfying and gratifying to do hand work than digital, as I believe that’s ridiculous since there are a million different mediums people use.
While definitely anyone can use any medium they’d like, looking at the skill and style mostly there’s a big difference and I’m not sure that many digital painters should have similar result as if they did it traditionallyI mentioned that I believe a lot about art has to do with style, and I don’t think one is more of a piece of art the other. Pieces created with Wacom tablets aren’t real art. I’m sure that the page is planning to appear in the top three results and people must be attracted to the page, when keywords are searched for regarding a particular topic. By the way, the second technique is of the use of hashtags which is very popular nowadays to get fans by this interesting way by describing feeling about the page.
By the way, the page will come into sight on their timeline and they will see it.
People tending to have similar interests in the content of page will definitely be attracted to your page.
The first is the use of keywords. For the most part there’re three main marketing techniques which are used for this work. One can increase their integrity by buy real Facebook post likes. Henceforth, people would’ve been attracted and should visit the page. Third technique is using one’s interest. Okay, that typing handwriting comment made me laugh.